Cases 1 - 10 of 124
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01177
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv01178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination
AML IP, LLC v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
AML IP, LLC
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Marine Srapian v. Mattress Firm, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02508
Plaintiff:
Marine Srapian
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv17026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Everett et al v. Mattress Firm, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv02020
Plaintiff:
Amy Everett, David Shattuck and David Jackson
Defendant:
Mattress Firm, Inc. and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Phillips v. Mattress Firm Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09134
Plaintiff:
Tyler R. Phillips
Defendant:
Mattress Firm Inc. and Kia Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeffrey Gundell v. Sleepys LLC, et al
as 23-2780
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY GUNDELL, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
SLEEPYS LLC and MATTRESS FIRM INC, as successor in interest to Sleep's, LLC
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc. v. MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
as 2:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Adaptive Avenue Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
MATTRESS FIRM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
