Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Hardy v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Brevard County)
as 6:2021cv02031
Petitioner:
Reginald Maurice Hardy
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hardy v. Ivey et al
as 6:2020cv00496
Defendant:
(2) Unnamed Law Clerks, Evelyn Denardo, Michelle Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
Reginal Maurice Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Silver's Crust West Indian Restaurant & Grill Inc
as 1:2017cv02415
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hardy
Defendant:
Silver's Crust West Indian Restaurant & Grill Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
US v. Maurice Hardy
as 16-7011
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE HARDY, a/k/a Reece
Hardy v. USA - 2255
as 1:2014cv03622
Petitioner:
Maurice Hardy
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Hardy v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01068
Plaintiff:
Maurice Hardy
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy Products Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Maurice Hardy
as 13-4513
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICE HARDY, a/k/a Reece
Age et al v. Gulf Stream Coach,Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03930
Plaintiff:
Charlie Age , Queen Age , Alana Alexander and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Age et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv02892
Plaintiff:
Charlie Age, Charlie Age, Queen Age and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc., Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Hardy v. Watters
as 2:2007cv00425
Petitioner:
Maurice Hardy
Respondent:
Steve Watters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
