Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Adam Ghadiri v. Mercedes Repair by Maurice et al
as 2:2020cv08572
Defendant:
MERCEDES REPAIR BY MAURICE, INC., MERCEDES REPAIR BY MAURICE, MILLER, WAYNE & ELIZABETH TRUST and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Ghadiri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Adam Ghadiri v. Mercedes Repair by Maurice et al
as 8:2020cv01821
Defendant:
Mercedes Repair by Maurice, Inc., Miller, Wayne and Elizabeth and Mercedes Repair by Maurice
Plaintiff:
Adam Ghadiri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Michael v. Harley-Davidson, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
Lisa Michael
Defendant:
Harley-Davidson, Inc., Maurice, Inc., Rommel Motorsports of North Carolina, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
United Fabrics International Inc v. Maurices Inc et al
as 2:2013cv02811
Defendant:
Ascena Retail Group Inc, Does and Maurices Inc
Plaintiff:
United Fabrics International Inc
L A Printex Industries Inc v. Concepts by Malcolm Inc et al
as 2:2012cv07438
Defendant:
Concepts by Malcolm Inc, Does, Dressbarn Inc and others
Plaintiff:
L A Printex Industries Inc
GEOTAG, INC. v. YAKIRA, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2010cv00587
Plaintiff:
GEOTAG, INC.
Defendant:
YAKIRA, L.L.C. , ACE HARDWARE CORP. , AEROPOSTALE, INC. and others
Counter_claimant:
BELK, INC.
Counter_defendant:
GEOTAG, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. One Step Up Ltd. et al
as 2:2009cv05561
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
One Step Up Ltd., Big M, Inc., Ross Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Type:
Intellectual Property
L. A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Charming Shoppes, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv04560
Plaintiff:
L. A. Printex Industries, Inc. and L. A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Defendant:
Charming Shoppes, Inc., Fashion Bug Retail Companies, Inc., Lane Bryant, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
