Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ramirez-Hernandez v. Garland
as 23-3518
Petitioner:
MAURICIO RAMIREZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez et al v. ZCCL, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Ramirez and Victor Ramirez
Defendant:
ZCCL, Inc.
Daniel Ramirez-Munoz v. William P. Barr
as 20-1567
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Attorney General of United States
Petitioner:
Daniel Mauricio Ramirez-Munoz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramirez v. Roka Japanese Food Inc.
as 19-1868
Defendant:
Roka Japanese Food Inc. and Dian Chi Zhou, AKA Larry Zhou
Defendant / Appellant:
Joyce Lin, AKA Mei Lin
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jose Santos Mauricio Ramirez
Ramirez v. Roka Japanese Food Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00296
Defendant:
Joyce Lin, Roka Japanese Food Inc. and Dian Chi Zhou
Plaintiff:
Jose Santos Mauricio Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mauricio Bojorquez Ramirez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-72025
Petitioner:
MAURICIO ALFREDO BOJORQUEZ RAMIREZ, AKA Carlos Bojorquez, AKA Mauricio Bojorquez, AKA Mauricio Ramirez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
United States of America v. Gonzalez
as 10-3306
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Euler DeJesus Soto-Gallo, AKA Sealed Defendant 2, Gabriel Ceballos, AKA Sealed Defendant 3, Bacerra-Pinzon, AKA Sealed Defendant 4 and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Pedro Gonzalez, AKA Sealed Defendant 1
USA v. Mauricio Acosta-Ramirez
as 10-50442
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAURICIO ACOSTA-RAMIREZ, also known as Mauricio Ramirez-Acosta
Ramirez-Bello v. United States of America
as 2:2008cv14316
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Ramirez-Bello
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
