Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cornel Jackson v. County of Madera, et al
as 22-16920
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CORNEL JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, a Municipality of the State of California, BRETT FRAZIER, DAVID ROGERS and others
Jackson v. County of Madera, et al.
as 1:2022cv00069
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
County of Madera, Brett Frazier, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40147
Plaintiff:
MAX RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Linn v. Madera County et al
as 1:2018at00613
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, David Rogers, Robert Poythress and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Linn v. Madera County et al
as 1:2018cv01128
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, Bret Fraisier, David Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
David A. Linn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
v. Madera County et al
as 1:2018at00610
Defendant:
Eric Fleming, Kimberely Horiuchi, David Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McDonald's Corporation v. Rodriguez
as 2:2017cv02110
Plaintiff:
McDonald's Corporation
Defendant:
Max Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
RODRIGUEZ et al v. REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
as 2:2013cv06276
Plaintiff:
AUDREY RODRIGUEZ and MAX RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
USA v. Maximino Rodriguez-Roble
as 12-50401
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MAXIMINO RODRIGUEZ-ROBLES, AKA Max Rodriguez
Estate of Forrest et al v. Sunvest Communities USA, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv00746
Plaintiff:
William A Estate of Forrest, Philip Karter, Rhonda Karter and others
Defendant:
Sunvest Communities USA, LLC, Desert Shores Holdings, LLC, Realty Management, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
