Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Maxim Equipment Inc. v. United States et al
as 1:2026cv05022
Defendant:
Rodney S. Scott, in his official capacity as Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and United States
Plaintiff:
Maxim Equipment Inc.
Walker v. Howell et al
as 3:2026cv01704
Defendant:
THE CAUDEL LAW FIRM, P.A., GWENDOLYN FAY DIPERT and MAXIM BARNABY HOWELL
Plaintiff:
Scott Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Cesario, et al. v. Saxe, et al.
as 26-7272
Defendant:
COLLEEN SMITH, TIM LUGO, MYLES MINTER and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID PREKA and JOHN CESARIO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02640
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MAXIM v. SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
as 2:2026cv02301
Plaintiff:
ALEX MAXIM
Defendant:
SCHEDULE A DEFENDANTS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
In re: Maxime Augustin
as 26-13918
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: MAXIME AUGUSTIN
ALL-CLAD METALCRAFTERS, LLC v. RAIDER COMMERCE LLC et al
as 2:2026cv02254
Plaintiff:
ALL-CLAD METALCRAFTERS, LLC
Defendant:
RAIDER COMMERCE LLC, MAXIM RAIDER MAXIMOV, JR. and JOHN DOES 1 - 10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv05849
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Augustin v. St. Lucie County
as 2:2026cv14352
Plaintiff:
Maxime Augustin
Defendant:
St. Lucie County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Union Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Subin Associates, LLP
as 26-2558
Defendant:
JORGE LUPI, SUBIN ASSOCIATES, LLP, SUBIN & ASSOCIATES, LLC and others
:
UNION MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, JASON M. GALLINA, M.D. and JASON M. GALLINA, M.D. PC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
