Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Mayette v. JUUL Labs, Inc., et al
as 3:2021cv09033
Plaintiff:
Michael Mayette
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. doing business as Pax Labs, Inc. and Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MAYETTE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv27745
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KANE D MAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THE ESTATE OF MARY L. MAYETTE v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv16504
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF MARY L. MAYETTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stratton et al v. Nationwide Solutions LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03574
Plaintiff:
Bessie Stratton , Leon Ayres , Gregory D. Cobb and others
Defendant:
Nationwide Solutions LLC, Yvenet Mayette, Bridge Transport Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Mayette v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2016cv01297
Plaintiff:
Pattie A. Mayette
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Troy Anderson v. Melissa Smith, et al
as 14-16185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY J. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MELISSA A. SMITH, DANA FILKOWSKI, CHRIS MARTIN and others
Anderson v. Smith et al
as 5:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Troy J. Anderson
Defendant:
Melissa A. Smith, Dana Filkowski, Chris Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayette Munoz-Gonzalez v. U.S. Attorney General
as 13-11561
Petitioner:
MAYETTE MUNOZ-GONZALEZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edjuan v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Department of Martinez Detention Facility et al
as 3:2011cv04728
Plaintiff:
Scott C. Edjuan
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Department of Martinez Detention Facility, Mayette, Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
