Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lebron Lopez v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv11793
Plaintiff:
Mayra Lebron Lopez
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Loreal USA, Inc., Loreal USA Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. Waldorf=Astoria LLC
as 6:2020cv01158
Defendant:
WALDORF=ASTORIA EMPLOYER LLC and WALDORF ASTORIA ORLANDO
Plaintiff:
MAYRA I. LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ANTHONY et al v. JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2019cv01055
Plaintiff:
ERIC ANTHONY and MAYRA TOVAR-LOPEZ
Defendant:
COPART, INC., NATIONWIDE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and JAMES RIVER INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lopez et al v. New York State Board of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv03493
Defendant:
Shaw, Mayra I. Lopez, New York State Board of Parole and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayra A. Lopez et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration
as 2:2015cv00678
Plaintiff:
Hector R. Cerna and Mayra A. Lopez
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Felipe Lopez-Gomez, et al v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-72099
Petitioner:
FELIPE DE JESUS LOPEZ-GOMEZ, AKA Felipe J. Lopez Gomez, MARIA VENEGAS-GUERRA, AKA Maria M. Lopez Venegas, CECILIA V. LOPEZ-VENEGAS and others
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Lopez v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
as 3:2010cv00792
Plaintiff:
Mayra Y. Lopez
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank and DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sonia E F Franco, et al v. Dow Chemical Company, et al
as 2:2003cv05094
Plaintiff:
Calipta Teresa Martinez, Freddy Victorino Caceres Flores, Andrea Melania Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Shell Chemical Company and Dow Chemical Company The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
