Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Taylor v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation and McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
as 1:2023cv00008
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Taylor
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. JUSTIN ORTEGA et al
as 3:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
OSWALD WILSON
Defendant:
MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE, LLC, KRISTINA G. MURTHA, KLM LAW GROUP, PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sander v. JP Morgan Chase et al
as 7:2022cv01543
Plaintiff:
Marie Sander
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase, JP Morgan Chase NA, Jamie Diamon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harvey v. Brooks et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Grace Lyn Harvey doing business as GLM Realty Group LLC
Defendant:
Barry John Brooks, Ada Brown, Renee Harris Toliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Worth v. Picard et al
as 3:2021cv00432
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Edward DiLieto, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Keyin Worth and Keyin T. Worth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. U.S. Bank National Association et al
as 3:2018cv00791
Plaintiff:
Martin A. Lewis
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Andrew Cecere, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Watson v. CitiMortgage, Inc et al
as 3:2018cv00702
Plaintiff:
David Watson
Defendant:
CitiMortgage, Inc, Paul Ince, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bolden v. Miller
as 17-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Charles Will Bolden
Defendant - Appellee:
Grant Miller, Jr., State of Connecticut, McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC., (101589) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
