Cases 1 - 10 of 100
McCullum v. Slaczka et al
as 5:2026ct03174
Plaintiff:
DaShawn Dominique McCullum
Defendant:
Sgt. Kamil Slaczka, Lt. Ramel Freeman, Sergeant Muracha and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
McCullum v. American Homes
as 1:2026cv04865
Plaintiff:
Alesia McCullum
Defendant:
AMH American Homes, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Schwab v. Rewerts et al
as 2:2026cv10568
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Schwab
Defendant:
Randy Rewerts, Ward, Crater and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Pattison v. Tolotti et al
as 3:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dante Pattison
Defendant:
Tolotti, Crystal Padilla, Elain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. McCullum et al
as 4:2026cv00119
Plaintiff:
Tanisha Hudson
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company, S.I. and Dominique McCullum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Torre, et al v. State of ME Department of Health and Human Service, et al
as 26-1012
Plaintiff:
LOUANN MAFFEI, JAMES MAFFEI, LYNN TORRE and others
Defendant:
VICTORIA KNIGHT-LANE, in the individual capacity, JOSEPH CUSHMAN, in the individual capacity, MARTIN J. ROYLE, in the individual capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Acovera et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv13163
Plaintiff:
Francisco Acovera, Margaret Ankney, John Bauer and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation, Archroma US Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
