Cases 1 - 10 of 311
Agness McCurry, et alIn re: Agness McCurry, et al
as 24-5405
Petitioner:
In re: AGNESS MCCURRY and ETHA JONES
McCurry v. O'Malley
as 24-50243
Plaintiff:
Benn McCurry
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Guerrero et al v. Adams County Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv00855
Plaintiff:
Belynn Guerrero, Terry Martin, Belynn (I) Guerrero and others
Defendant:
Adams County Colorado, Gene Claps, Adams County Board of County Commissioners and others
McCurry v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01623
Plaintiff:
Michael McCurry
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Agness McCury, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5208
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Agness McCurry, et al v. Thomas Wright, et al
as 24-5196
Plaintiff:
ETHA JONES and AGNESS MCCURRY
Defendant:
JUDGE THOMAS J. WRIGHT, BENJAMIN CURTIS MCCURRY, KELLY J. MCCURRY and others
Essex Capital Group, INC v. Warnell, Jr. et al
as 8:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
ESSEX CAPITAL GROUP, INC and Essex Capital Group, INC.
Defendant:
Harold Brooks Warnell, Jr., Kenneth Hampton Warnell, AgSouth Farm Credit, ACA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
McCurry v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Michael McCurry
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Oppenheimer v. McCurry et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Christy Gale McCurry, Kenneth D McCurry, Highland Craftsman, Inc. as Administrator of the Estate of d/b/a Barkhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
McCurry v. Epic Road, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv01034
Plaintiff:
Steve McCurry
Defendant:
Epic Road, LLC and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
