Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MCCUTCHIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03219
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JUDY G. MCCUTCHIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BALL v. NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2015cv01847
Plaintiff:
DAWN BALL
Defendant:
NORRISTOWN STATE HOSPITAL, EDNA MCCUTCHIN, JOHN DOE DIRECTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEREZ v. MCCUTCHIN et al
as 2:2013cv05492
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. PEREZ
Defendant:
SAMUEL MCCUTCHIN, CYNTHIA LINDENMAN, SNYDER HEATING COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Petitioner:
WILLIAM REECE, DIANE REECE, HERMAN TOLBERT and others
Respondent:
AES CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, AES SHADY POINT, a Delaware Corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and others
Reece, et al v. AES Corporation, et al
as 13-604
Respondent:
HANNA OIL & GAS COMPANY, an Arkansas corporation, AES SHADY POINT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, ENERVEST OPERATING, LLC and others
Petitioner:
DIANE REECE, WILLIAM REECE, SUSAN HOLMES and others
Bashir v. Dean et al
as 4:2013cv00071
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jamal Bashir
Defendant:
Betty Dean, Ledford, Huskey and others
Bashir v. Dean et al
as 6:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jamal Bashir
Defendant:
Betty Dean, Stewart, Ledford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bashir v. Dean et al
as 4:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jamal Bashir
Defendant:
Betty Dean, Ledford, Huskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bashir v. Dean et al
as 4:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jamal Bashir
Defendant:
Betty Dean, FNU McCutchins, FNU Stewart and others
Bashir v. Dean et al
as 1:2013cv00041
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jamal Bashir
Defendant:
Betty Dean, FNU McCutchins, FNU Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
