Cases 11 - 20 of 126
MEYERS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2022cv01096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, TODD ISHEE, BRADESHAWN HARRIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Pittman
as 5:2022ct03424
Plaintiff:
Frank Junour McDonald
Defendant:
Lt. Michael Pittman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MCDONALD v. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
as 1:2022cv00680
Plaintiff:
Damian McDonald
Defendant:
LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
Oppenheimer v. McDonald et al
as 1:2022cv00098
Plaintiff:
David Gordon Oppenheimer
Defendant:
Foster McDonald, Jennifer Blake, Edmund Hillis II and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Edwards v. New Day Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
Estate of Vivian Profitt McDonald and Amanda Edwards
Defendant:
New Day Financial, LLC, Commonwealth Real Estate Information Services, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and others
Owen v. Goodwin et al
as 1:2021cv00217
Plaintiff:
James Bradley Owen
Defendant:
Christopher M. Goodwin, Benjamin Hawkins, Jacob Tipton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FUNDERBURK v. MCDONALD
as 1:2021cv00574
Plaintiff:
BRUCE J. FUNDERBURK
Defendant:
S. M. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guerrero et al v. Bank of America N.A.
as 3:2021cv00333
Plaintiff:
Jesus Guerrero, Maureen Young, Rachelle Blake and others
Defendant:
Bank of America N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDonald v. USA
as 3:2021cv00309
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rahkeem Lee McDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
