Cases 1 - 10 of 16
McEntire v. Wise Health Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
James K. McEntire
Defendant:
Wise Health Solutions, LLC, Veracious Investigative Compliance Colutions International, LLC and Oaksterdam University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
McEntire v. Messensmith et al
as 4:2023cv00164
Plaintiff:
James McEntire
Defendant:
Messensmith, Victoria Scott, Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McEntire v. Morgan et al
as 6:2019cv03220
Defendant:
Chad Morgan and Jimmy Russell
Plaintiff:
Terry Dale McEntire
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McEntire v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Byron McEntire
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SP Clayton LLC v. McEntire
as 4:2017cv00029
Defendant:
Jeffrey Richard McEntire
Plaintiff:
SP Clayton LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Mcentire v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2016cv02273
Plaintiff:
Shawn Casey Mcentire
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
McEntire v. Moore et al
as 3:2014cv03001
Plaintiff:
Terry Dale McEntire
Defendant:
Mike Moore and Jason Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joshua McEntire v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 13-3623
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joshua D. McEntire
Defendant - Appellee:
Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
McEntire v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2013cv00022
Plaintiff:
Vergil McEntire
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McEntire v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 1:2009cv00141
Plaintiff:
Joshua D. McEntire
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
