Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Glatz vs Newcomb et al
as 3:2022cv00235
Plaintiff:
Glenn Fred Glatz
Defendant:
Ronald Crockett Newscomb, James Bruce Dunn, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMahon v. Sansone et al
as 3:2021cv00280
Defendant:
T. Andrew Smith, Jackie M. Clegg, Lucinda M. Baier and others
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McMahon
Davis v. Baier et al
as 3:2020cv00929
Defendant:
Denise W. Warren, T. Andrew Smith, Mark J. Parrell and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Davis, Cynthia McMahon, Robert Bazinet and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Victoria L. Freed
McMahon v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (JRG1)
as 3:2020cv00086
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Robin Archer McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
United States of America v. Thrift Saving Plan
as 2:2017cv02531
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Garnishee:
Thrift Saving Plan
Defendant:
Don McMahon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahon v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv01152
Movant:
William Anthony McMahon
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
J.H., by next friend Betty Harris v. Williamson County et al
as 3:2014cv02356
Plaintiff:
J.H., by next friend Betty Harris
Defendant:
Williamson County , Juan Cruz, Steve McMahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
