Cases 1 - 10 of 31
McPherson v. Hill et al
as 6:2024cv06164
Petitioner:
Oswald McPherson
Respondent:
Superintendent Hill and DOCCS Commissioner Martuscello, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McPherson v. US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 3:2023cv00544
Petitioner:
McPherson
Respondent:
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
St. Louis v. Cook et al
as 3:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Chadwick St. Louis
Defendant:
Rollin Cook, Robert Martin, Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Feder et al
as 3:2023cv00071
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Collins
Defendant:
Ingrid Feder, Brian Rader, Francesco Lupis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockett v. Lupis
as 22-1278
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steven Brockett
Defendant / Appellee:
Dr. Francesco Lupis
Defendant:
Chena McPherson, A.P.R.N., Brian Schmidtberg, Doctor, UCONN and Kristen Shea, R.C.O.O.
Rahim v. Barsto et al
as 3:2022cv00619
Plaintiff:
Mohamad Rahim
Defendant:
Barsto, Campbell, King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinnel v. Quieros et al
as 3:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Marquis Kinnel
Defendant:
Quieros, Jesus Guadarama, Andre Samuda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harnage v. Martin et al
as 3:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
Robert Martin, Oles, Nicholas Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
