Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Tatum et al v National Football League et al
as 0:2014cv01265
Plaintiff:
John L. Outlaw, Artis Houston, Horace Copeland and others
Defendant:
NFL Productions, L.L.C. and National Football League
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Michael Murphy v. Ellis McSwain, et al
as 14-1704
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Board Member/Employe John Doe, (# 1-99) and Board Member/Employe Jane Doe, (# 1-99)
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and Chuck Pryor
Keith Young v. Rhonda Pash, et al
as 14-1533
Petitioner - Appellant:
Keith Stanley Young
Respondent - Appellee:
Rhonda Pash and Ellis McSwain, Jr.
Murphy v. Missouri Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 2:2014cv04031
Plaintiff:
Michael Dunham Murphy
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation & Parole, Ellis McSwain, Chuck Prior and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keith Young v. Rhonda Pash, et al
as 13-3687
Petitioner:
Keith Stanley Young
Respondent:
Rhonda Pash and Ellis McSwain, Jr.
Blanchard v. State of Missouri
as 4:2013cv02446
Petitioner:
Boyce Lamarr Blanchard
Respondent:
Elllis McSwain, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jim Harris v. Ellis McSwain, et al
as 13-3239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jim R. Harris
Defendant - Appellee:
Ellis McSwain, MO Dept. of Corrections, Lisa Looten and others
Young v. Pash
as 4:2013cv01880
Petitioner:
Keith Stanley Young
Respondent:
Rhonda Pash and Ellis McSwain, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Little v. McSwain
as 4:2013cv01598
Petitioner:
Harry Little
Respondent:
Ellis McSwain, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Biddy v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2013cv01364
Petitioner:
George Randall Biddy
Respondent:
Missouri Department of Corrections, George A. Lombardi, Division of the Board of Probation and Parole and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
