Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McLeod v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00032
Plaintiff:
Suzanne McLeod
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
McCormick v. Wright et al
as 5:2023ct03028
Plaintiff:
Markus Odon McCormick
Defendant:
Sheriff Ennis Wright, Deputy Sheriff Jamie McLeod, Officer Ramon Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Girard et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Girard, Beulah Slesser and Suzanne McLeod
Defendant:
United States of America
CASE OPENED IN ERROR - Girard et al v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Girard, Beulah Slesser and Suzanne McLeod, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Hansell B. Malone, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
444 Inc. v. Nemyo et al
as 5:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
444 Inc.
Defendant:
Jeffrey W Nemyo and Lavinia McLeod Criswell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Byrd v. McLeod et al
as 5:2022ct03134
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Byrd
Defendant:
Sergeant McLeod, Sergeant Smith, Curtis Ward, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PULLEY v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2020cv00913
Petitioner:
LARRY MCLEOD and LARRY MCLEOD PULLEY
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Parker v. Saul
as 7:2020cv00073
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
DANIEL MCLEOD PARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
