Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Toney v. Medford Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv01318
Defendant:
James E. Williams, Medford Police Department and Cory Schwab
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Toney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt et al v. RVVCO et al
as 1:2017cv00209
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hernandez, Cody Markell and Lederrick Nesbitt
Defendant:
Jackson County Jail, Medford Police Department and RVVCO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Libby et al v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2015cv00298
Defendant:
Officer Baglietto, City of Medford, Detective Bill Ford and others
Plaintiff:
Don Libby and Jason Libby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Knight et al v. Crain et al
as 1:2014cv00075
Defendant:
Access, Nurse Artist, Ashland Christian Fellowship and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Lynn Knight
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brewer v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2013cv00541
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Brewer
Defendant:
City of Medford, Dep. Chief Tim Doney, Chief Tim George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brewer v. City of Medford et al
as 1:2013cv00540
Plaintiff:
Joshua Ryan Brewer
Defendant:
City of Medford, Dep. Chief Tim Doney, Chief Tim George and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Medford Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv03126
Plaintiff:
Donald Edward LaRue Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Medford Police Department and OZ Fitness
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ralph E. Smith v. Nicole Allain, et al
as 1:2009cv11835
Defendant:
Nicole Allain, Medford Police Department, Paul Mackowski and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEINER v. MCCULLIAN et al
as 2:2009cv00976
Plaintiff:
MAX WEINER
Defendant:
MARK J. MCCULLIAN, THOMAS PETERS, PHILADELPHIA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
