Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ford v. USP Big Sandy, Medical Director et al
as 7:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Samuel B. Ford
Defendant:
USP Big Sandy, Medical Director, Warden, USP Big Sandy, Albert Bourla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gandy v. Boyd et al
as 0:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
James Gandy
Defendant:
P.A. Boyd, Medical Director of Ashland FCI and Director of Psychology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hatmaker et al v. Rockcastle County, Kentucky et al
as 6:2021cv00094
Defendant:
Nathan Carter, Rockcastle County, Kentucky, Suzanne Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Downs and Tristan Winstead
Executor:
Lucy Hatmaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaffer v. Daviess County, Kentucky et al
as 4:2019cv00133
Defendant:
Arthur Maglinger, Lorrin Mix, Ohio County Detention Center Medical Contractor and others
Plaintiff:
Brandi Shaffer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Sherley v. Thompson et al
as 4:2014cv00063
Plaintiff:
Frank R. Sherley
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Alan Brown, Robert Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Carroll County et al
as 3:2012cv00068
Plaintiff:
Jack A. Wilson
Defendant:
Carroll County , Carroll County Detention Center , Michael Humphrey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Jefferson County Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
Jefferson County Corrections, Tom Campbell, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Dorris v. Critchelow et al
as 4:2008cv00067
Plaintiff:
Charlie Dorris
Defendant:
Jerry Critchelow, Don Beemer, Terry Chinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Browder v. Haas et al
as 3:2007cv00676
Plaintiff:
Joe A. Browder
Defendant:
Scott Haas, Michael Fairchild, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
