Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant:
Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEYERS v. DENISON et al
as 1:2022cv00456
Plaintiff:
DAVID MYERS and DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
DR. SANDRA M. DENISON, NURSE PONTAINE-PONTON, PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP, INC.-WELLPATH HOLDINGS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Neil v. Cartiva, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00072
Plaintiff:
Gina Neil
Defendant:
Cartiva, Inc., Wright Medical Group, N.V. and Stryker B.V.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cansler v. University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina, Inc. d/b/a Vidant Health et al
as 4:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
GEORGE CANSLER
Defendant:
University Health Systems of Eastern Carolina, Inc. d/b/a Vidant Health, East Carolina Health-Chowan, Inc., Halifax Regional Medical Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00547
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
