Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. 2.9449 Acres of Land, More or Less, et al
as 5:2020cv00023
Defendant:
Antonio J. Medina, Jr. and 2.9449 Acres of Land, More or Less
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC v. 2.00 Acres Permanent Easement, and 3.2 Acres Temporary Easement of Land in City of Green, Summit County, Ohio Easement, And 3.2 Acres Temporary Easement Of Land et al.
as 5:2017cv02062
Plaintiff:
Nexus Gas Transmission, LLC
Defendant:
2.00 Acres Permanent Easement, and 3.2 Acres Temporary Easement of Land in City of Green, Summit County, Ohio, Aqua Ohio, Inc., Duck Creek Energy Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Western Reserve Land Conservancy
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 946
ROVER PIPELINE LLC v. ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-001.000T et al
as 2:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
ROVER PIPELINE LLC
Defendant:
ROVER TRACT NO. PA-WA-HL-001.000T, JUSTIN D. SMITH, WENDY J. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Johnson v. Wolan et al
as 1:2010cv01622
Plaintiff:
Theodore F. Johnson
Defendant:
Natalia Wolan, Hector Medina, West 118th Realty Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Sanely Medina v. State of NJ, et al
as 09-4595
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SANELY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF NJ and CITY OF CAMDEN
United States of America v. Land et al
as 2:2009cv03774
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Land and Carolyn Ann Medina Cracco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 lc Land Condemnation
MEDINA v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2008cv04222
Plaintiff:
SANELY MEDINA
Defendant:
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, THE PRESIDANT OF THE UNITED STATES, THE CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MEDINA v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2008cv04223
Plaintiff:
SANELY MEDINA
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and CITY OF CAMDEN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
