Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02995
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02991
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC. v. FIVE P MOUNTAIN, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
RAMADA WORLDWIDE INC.
Defendant:
FIVE P MOUNTAIN, LLC, MAYANK PATEL, MEHUL PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnny Kim, et al v. Cashcall, Inc.
as 21-55729
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOHNNY KIM, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated employees
Plaintiff:
JASON AU, TAM VAN, TAN NGO and others
Defendant / Appellant:
CASHCALL, INC.
FELICIANO-MATEO v. DI GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00211
Plaintiff:
MAGALY FELICIANO-MATEO
Defendant:
DI GROUP, LLC doing business as CAROLINA DUKE INN and MEHUL PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Blochowicz v. Wilkie et al
as 1:2020cv00111
Defendant:
Joan Weber, Robert Wilkie, Michelle Cox-Henley and others
Plaintiff:
Kimberly M. Blochowicz and Jeffrey M. Blochowicz
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Acosta v. CSP, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00748
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
CSP, Inc. , Raj Patel 1, Inc. , Mehul Patel and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
