Cases 61 - 70 of 3,860
Mejia v. American Multi Cinema et al
as 2:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Andrea Mejia
Defendant:
American Multi Cinema, Zurich American Insurance Company, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Personal Injury
USA v. Arreola-Mejia
as 24-40101
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Samuel Arreola-Mejia
Hernandez v. City of Middletown N.Y. Police et al
as 7:2024cv01282
Plaintiff:
Jose Mejia Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Middletown N.Y. Police, Detectives Division, John Doe Detective(s) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mejia v. USA
as 3:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Angelo Mejia
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
United States of America v. Mejia
as 24-664
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MEJIA
Leger et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
DONNA LEGER and CHRISTIAN LEGER
Defendant:
United States of America and DAMACIO MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Barrington Pacific LLC v. Daniel Mejia et al
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
Barrington Pacific LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Mejia, Stacy Grey and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Velecela-Rojas v. Garland
as 24-299
Petitioner:
VIVIANA PAOLA VELECELA-ROJAS and ASHLEY MARIUXI MEJIA-VELECELA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mejia-Disla v. Deinde Financial, LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Melanie Mejia-Disla
Defendant:
Deinde Financial, LLC, Deinde Group, LLC and Transportation Alliance Bank, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Diaz Olarte v. Grand Car Wash, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00712
Plaintiff:
Darwin Diaz Olarte
Defendant:
Grand Car Wash, Inc., Big Bubble Car Wash Inc. and William Mejia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
