Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Robinson v. Henderson County Hospital Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00068
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Defendant:
Henderson County Hospital Corporation doing business as Pardee and Southeastern Sports Medicine Services, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Robinson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00058
Plaintiff:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Robinson v. Pilgram
as 22-124
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN RICHARD ROBINSON, III
Defendant / Appellee:
A. PILGRAM and P. NAPLES
Melvin Robinson, III v. A. Pilgram, et al
as 22-5001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Melvin Richard Robinson, III
Defendant / Appellee:
A. Pilgram, Secret Service and P. Naples, Secret Service
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Melvin Robinson, III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 21-2258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN RICHARD ROBINSON, III
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Melvin Robinson, III v. Brickton Village Association, Inc.
as 21-1845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN RICHARD ROBINSON, III
Defendant / Appellee:
BRICKTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC., f/k/a Brickton Village HOA and LM PROPERTY
Melvin Robinson, III v. Pardee UNC Healthcare
as 21-1149
Defendant / Appellee:
SOUTHEASTERN SPORTS MEDICINE AND ORTHOPEDIC and PARDEE UNC HEALTHCARE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN RICHARD ROBINSON, III
Melvin Robinson, III v. Brickton Village Association
as 21-1057
Defendant / Appellee:
BRICKTON VILLAGE ASSOCIATION, INC., f/k/a Brickton Village HOA and LM PROPERTY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN RICHARD ROBINSON, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
