Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Rogers v. Car Connection of Mentor, Inc. et al.
as 1:2026cv01496
Plaintiff:
Rogers Tayshawna
Defendant:
Car Connection of Mentor, Inc. and Credit Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Alcorn v. Millionaire Mentor, Inc.
as 1:2026cv23704
Plaintiff:
Victor Alcorn
Defendant:
Millionaire Mentor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Schmidt et al v. National Mentor Holdings, LLC
as 0:2026cv02614
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Schmidt and Amber N. Guthrie
Defendant:
National Mentor Holdings, LLC doing business as Sevita Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Mentor v. Key Motors of South Burlington LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00134
Plaintiff:
Marvin Mentor
Defendant:
Key Motors of South Burlington LLC, John Strout, Stephen Menard and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00863
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hoffman, et al. v. VMG Partners, LLC, et al.
as 26-1995
Plaintiff:
SHARON HOFFMAN, individually, ODELYA HOFFMAN, RGL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
Defendant:
DEEPAK AGARWAL, MICHAEL BITENSKY, GOLI NUTRITION, INC., A Canadian Corporation and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
