Cases 41 - 50 of 590
Anthony Stokes v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 24-5034
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DARNELL STOKES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General, GARY SWANEY, Warden, FCI Manchester and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Parks v. United States of America et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Carlton B Parks
Defendant:
United States of America, Jeffrey S. Sutton, Travis R. McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ramul Celestin v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3015
Petitioner:
RAMUL CELESTIN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Johann Siabatto Cardona v. Merrick Garland
as 24-3003
Petitioner:
JOHANN CAMILO SIABATTO CARDONA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Robert J. Gargasz Co., L.P.A. et al v. Secretary of the Treasury et al.
as 1:2023cv02468
Plaintiff:
Robert J. Gargasz Co., L.P.A. and Robert J. Gargasz
Defendant:
Janet Yellen, Richard K. Delmar, U.S. Department of the Treasury and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Nery Gomez-Mata v. Merrick Garland
as 23-4024
Petitioner:
NERY WALBERTO GOMEZ-MATA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Marvin Caceres-Sanchez v. Merrick Garland
as 23-4025
Petitioner:
MARVIN CACERES-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Maria Lopez Pablo De De Leon, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-4027
Petitioner:
MARIA BERTAO LOPEZ PABLO DE DE LEON, MANOLO GILBERTO DE LEON LOPEZ, ABILIA MARVELI DE LEON LOPEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Dilma Hernandez-Carrillo, et al v. Merrick Garland
as 23-3993
Petitioner:
DILMA HERNANDEZ-CARRILLO, SULAIMA SUCELI LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ and MARLON GUDIEL LOPEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
