Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Carson v. City of Vicksburg et al
as 3:2024cv00153
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
City of Vicksburg, Robert Doe WC 74, Lt. Jeff Merritt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merritt v. Faurot et al
as 4:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Dallas Merritt
Defendant:
Matt Faurot and Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Merritt v. Casler et al
as 3:2020cv00568
Defendant:
Fort Transfer Company, John Does 1-5 and Anthony Casler
Plaintiff:
Richard Merritt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hearron v. Irons et al
as 3:2019cv00031
Defendant:
Dr. Jefferson P. Maldonald, MDOC Parole Officer Barbara Clark, Lt. Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Khristoffer Mandell Hearron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Cooley et al
as 3:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Carl J. Williams, Sr.
Defendant:
Carl Cooley and Jeff Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Merritt v. HPA Northridge, LLC
as 3:2017cv01022
Plaintiff:
Jean Merritt
Defendant:
HPA Northridge, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stallings v. Moore et al
as 3:2016cv00963
Plaintiff:
Kenyetta Stallings
Defendant:
Ann Merritt Moore and XYZ Corporations 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phillips v. Quality Choice Correctional Health Care et al
as 3:2015cv00412
Plaintiff:
Merritt Paxton Phillips
Defendant:
Quality Choice Correctional Health Care , Hinds County, Mississippi and John and Jane Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00026
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Johnson
Defendant:
McElroy Truck Lines, Inc. and Roy Merritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00002
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
