Cases 11 - 20 of 68
Christensen et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2023cv05255
Defendant:
3M Company, Cleaver-Brooks, Inc., Crane Environmental, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
David Emmett Christensen, Linda G. Christensen and Linda G Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Marcus et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv09058
Defendant:
CLEAVER BROOKS, INC., DOMCO PR.O.DUCTS TEXAS, INC., Honeywell International, Inc. FKA Allied Signal Inc, Individually and as Successor-in-Interest to the Bendix Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. MARCUS and VICTORIA L. MARCUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Gemaehlich et al v.Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv07518
Plaintiff:
Keith Gemaehlich and Betty Gemaehlich
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a subsidiary of AMPCO-PITTSBURGH CORPORATION, individually and as successor by merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., individually and successor in interest to BUFFALO FORGE, Albay Construction Company, ALFA LAVAL, INC., individually and as successor in interest to THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and SHARPLES CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Josephine Banks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2022cv06892
Plaintiff:
Josephine Banks, Jamie Banks, Nuevoe Strain and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Armstrong International Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Stephen C. Peet v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv06672
Plaintiff:
Stephen C. Peet
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Aurora Pump Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Nikolaus J. Marcher et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
Nikolaus J. Marcher and Lynne Marcher
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., 3M Company aka Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AES Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Karmon et al v. California Institute of Technology et al
as 2:2021cv08910
Plaintiff:
Eyerly Michael, Michael Karmon, Galit Rubin and others
Petitioner:
Fisher Scientific Company L.L.C.
Defendant:
Metalclad Insulation LLC, California Institute of Technology, Fisher Scientific Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division et al
as 2:2021cv08863
Plaintiff:
Benito C. Valdez, Jr. and Georgia Valdez
Petitioner:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Copes-Vulcan, Inc.
Defendant:
CBS Corporation, Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Buffalo Pumps Division and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Halowell et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv07647
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Halowell, Sr. and Martha C. Halowell
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Carrier Corporation, Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Pelton et al v. John Crane, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04316
Plaintiff:
Chloyde Pelton, Shirley Pelton and Crown, Cork and Seal Company, Inc., successor-in-interest to Mundet Cork Company
Cross Defendant:
John Crane, Inc., IMO Industries Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Turbine, Inc., and C.H. Wheeler Manufacturing Company and Goulds Pumps, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems, Inc., Successor by Merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., Carrier Corporaion, Carrier Global Corporation and others
Defendant:
Alfa Laval Inc., individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Purifiers, Amtrol Inc., successor-in-interest to Thrush Company and H.A. Thrush Company, Caterpillar, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
