Cases 71 - 80 of 424
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00515
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sanchez v. Methodist Hospital
as 3:2022cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rosalba Sanchez
Defendant:
Methodist Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tucson Medical Center et al v. Xavier Becerra
as 2:2022cv00989
Plaintiff:
Tucson Medical Center, Alton Memorial Hospital, Abbeville General Hospital and others
Petitioner:
Bethesda Memorial Hospital
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
LOPEZ v. NATOLI et al
as 1:2022cv00294
Plaintiff:
DEQUINCY R. LOPEZ
Defendant:
ROMAN NATOLI and METHODIST HOSPITAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
ANDERSON HOSPITAL et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON HOSPITAL, ASPIRUS RIVERVIEW HOSPITAL, AULTMAN HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
SCOTT v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv03085
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LAMAR SCOTT
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, INDIANA PROSECUTORS OFFICE, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF AND DEPUTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03279
Plaintiff:
METHODIST HOSPITALS OF DALLAS doing business as METHODIST CHARLTON MEDICAL CENTER doing business as METHODIST DALLAS MEDICAL CENTER doing business as METHODIST RICHARDSON MEDICAL CENTER and HENRY FORD MACOMB HOSPITAL CORPORATION
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01234
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
