Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Michael Paul Barber v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Barber
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
BROWN v. CATALENT, INC. ET AL.
as 3:2023cv15722
Plaintiff:
GREGORY BROWN
Defendant:
CATALENT, INC. ET AL., JOHN CHIMINSKI, ALESSANDRO MASELLI and others
Husty v. Catalent, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00891
Plaintiff:
Cameron Husty
Defendant:
J. Martin Carroll, Madhavan Balachandran, Michael J. Barber and others
Nominal Defendant:
Catalent, Inc.
Jeuudah v. City Of Houston et al
as 4:2022cv03233
Plaintiff:
Kay Jeuudah
Defendant:
City Of Houston, Sun Behavioral Houston, Lena Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Barber v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02055
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Dane Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barber et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2021cv02020
Defendant:
3M Company, The, DuPont de Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Michael E Barber and Patricia A Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26543
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW BARBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Paul Barber v. Andrew Saul
as 5:2021cv00241
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Barber, Michael v. Raymond L. Steele, et al
as 3:2020cv00763
Defendant:
Richard L Steele, Blackhawk Transportation, Raymond L Steele and others
Plaintiff:
Michael A Barber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
