Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cauley v. U S A
as 6:2018cv01158
Plaintiff:
Michaelle Avalon Cauley
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Universal Life Church Monaster, et al v. Michael Cauley, et al
as 14-15747
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE INC., a Washington Corporation and GEORGE FREEMAN, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CAULEY and UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH WORLD HEADQUARTERS INC.
Universal Life Church Monaste, et al v. Michael Cauley
as 13-15917
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE, INC., A Washington Corporation and GEORGE FREEMAN, An Individual
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL J CAULEY
UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE INC et al v. CAULEY et al
as 4:2013cv00546
Plaintiff:
UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH MONASTERY STOREHOUSE INC and GEORGE FREEMAN
Defendant:
MICHAEL J CAULEY, JANE DOE CAULEY and UNIVERSAL LIFE CHURCH WORLD HEADQUARTERS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse, Inc et al v. Cauley et al
as 2:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse Inc and George Freeman
Defendant:
Michael J Cauley, Jane Doe Cauley and Universal Life Church World Headquarters Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 5:2007cv02928
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Becker v. Ohio Attorney General et al
as 6:2007cv01417
Petitioner:
Jan F. Becker
Respondent:
Ohio Attorney General, Marc Dann, J. Petro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cauley v. Hammermeister
as 3:2007cv00009
Plaintiff:
Michael Wayne Cauley
Defendant:
Ted Hammermeister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
