Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv01629
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Turner v. Sewalt et al
as 1:2021cv01013
Plaintiff:
Christopher Turner
Defendant:
Timothy Sewalt, Corey May, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall v. United States of America
as 7:2017cv00118
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrell Randall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Randall v. USA
as 1:2016cv00802
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael Anthony Randall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Randall v. United States Of America
as 7:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
Michael Terrell Randall
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Spivey v. Randal et al
as 3:2013cv00503
Plaintiff:
Ray Charles Spivey
Defendant:
Michael P. Randal, Salvadore Godinez, Warden Atchinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Wexford Health Source Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv07265
Plaintiff:
Gerald Reed
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc., Kevin Holloran, Allen Karraker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zambrana v. Estaver et al
as 1:2011cv01364
Plaintiff:
George Zambrana
Defendant:
. Estaver, Mitchell, Stanley Simonson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Randall
as 11-50873
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL TERRELL RANDALL
Tony Anderson v. Michael Randall, et al
as 11-1890
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL P. RANDALL, Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, ROBERTA FEWS, Deputy Director of the Illinois Department of Corrections, JACKIE MILLER, Member of the Administrative Review Board and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
