Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Michael Waters v. Walter Kelly, et al
as 22-55797
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL LYNN WATERS
Defendant / Appellee:
WALTER KELLY, Acting Chief Probation Officer, RONALD MCMILLAN, Deputy Probation Officer, South Central Area Office and ROBERT ELLIS, SDPO
Michael Lynn Waters v. B. Cates
as 2:2022cv05019
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Waters
Respondent:
B. Cates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Lynn Waters v. Walter Kelly et al
as 2:2022cv04733
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Waters
Defendant:
Walter Kelly, Ronald McMillan and Robert Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Waters et al
as 5:2020ct03171
Plaintiff:
Dervan Brown and Lester Henry Kearney
Defendant:
Johnny Williams, Michael D. Waters, John Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lynn Waters v. The County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2020cv04303
Defendant:
Jackie Lacey, Robin Jacob Yanes, Steve Cooley and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Doe et al
as 3:2019cv00462
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Waters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennington v. Satterberg et al
as 2:2018cv01348
Defendant:
Jane Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), John Doe(s) Prosecutor(s), Ryan J. Erwin and others
Plaintiff:
Officer Jane Doe(s) and Jonathan Lawrence Dennington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lynn Waters v. State of California
as 2:2016cv01593
Respondent:
State of California
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Waters
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00330
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
WATERS v. COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA (VETERNS COURT) et al
as 5:2013cv00495
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. WATERS
Defendant:
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LANCASTER COUNTY OF PENNSYLVANIA (VETERNS COURT) and MARK FETTERMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
