Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Williams v. Dart
as 1:2021cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NATURAL PACK, INC. et al v. SYNDICATE SALES, INC, et al
as 1:2020cv00219
Defendant:
SYNDICATE SALES, INC., DOES 1-10, THOMAS C LUNSFORD and others
Plaintiff:
NATURAL PACK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ABDUL-GHAFOOR, et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATOIN, INC. et al
as 3:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
RHODA KATHLEEN BLAIR, LINDA COHILL, GUY E. DONA and others
Defendant:
RONALD D. ROMAIN and PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. Schochert et al
as 2:2018cv01053
Defendant:
Warden Paul Kemper, Jim Schochert and Sinai Samaritan Medical Center
Plaintiff:
Michael Alan Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams et al v. Brookstone Stores, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00044
Plaintiff:
Ashley C. Williams , Michael S. Williams and Garth Williams
Defendant:
Brookstone Stores, Inc., Brookstone, Inc., Brookstone Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Miller et al
as 1:2017cv07520
Plaintiff:
Michael J Williams
Defendant:
Dir. Miller and Pam Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Williams v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv04340
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Sevier et al
as 3:2017cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael Jerome Williams
Defendant:
Mark Sevier, Mrs Kallock, Dennis Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
