Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01532
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-20185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Austin Van Overdam
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael K. Young, In his official capacity, Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity and others
Van Overdam v. Texas A & M Univ
as 21-90008
Respondent:
Dayna Ford, In her official capacity, Kristen Harrell, In her official capacity, Texas A & M University and others
Petitioner:
Austin Van Overdam
Eustice v. Texas A & M University
as 21-20012
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas A & M University and Michael K. Young
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Christopher Eustice
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. v. Young
as 4:2020cv02913
Plaintiff:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc.
Defendant:
Young K. Michael and Michael K. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Young v. Kelly et al
as 2:2020cv02131
Defendant:
Johnny Hill, Robert Tanner, Beverly Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vernell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Cleveland et al
as 2:2020cv02077
Defendant:
Gertrude Estell, Donnie Seal, Floyd Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vernell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Young v. James LeBlanc, et al
as 20-30430
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin Luper, Colonel, Robert C. Tanner, Warden, B. B. Rayburn Correctional Center, Tim Crawford, Major and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Vernell Young
Kamme O v. Texas A&M University & System, et al
as 20-20183
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KAMME O
Defendant / Appellee:
KAYE BALL, MICHAEL K. YOUNG, TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY AND SYSTEM and others
Young v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2019cv13516
Defendant:
Kevin Luper, Robert Tanner, Suzanne Sheridan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Vernell Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
