Cases 61 - 70 of 345
USA v. Michael Carmody
as 22-12539
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ADAM CARMODY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Adams v. U.S. Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
as 1:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and US Social Security Administration, Acting Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
US Social Security Admin-Notice Only USA (Court Use Only) and US Social Security Administration - Notice Only (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Edmisten v. Gittere et al
as 3:2022cv00158
Plaintiff:
Justin Edmisten
Defendant:
William L. Gittere, Michael Adams and Noreagia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United Rentals, Inc. et al v. Adams
as 3:2022mc03001
Plaintiff:
United Rentals, Inc. and United Rentals (North America) Inc
Defendant:
Michael Adams
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv03380
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Adams v. National Health Insurance Company
as 5:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Michael Adams
Defendant:
National Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
