Cases 1 - 10 of 14
USA v. Anthony Alexander
as 22-1148
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY MICHAEL ALEXANDER
COHEN et al v. KOCH et al
as 2:2021cv11872
Plaintiff:
PROTEONOMIX, INC., MICHAEL M COHEN and ROGER FIDLER
Defendant:
VICTOR SUTHAMMANONT, TIMOTHY HALLORAN, UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Michael Nelson v. Attorney General United States
as 19-3455
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER NELSON, AKA Michael A. Nelson
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Michael Nelson v. Attorney General United States
as 19-1286
Petitioner:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER NELSON, AKA Michael A. Nelson
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
ALEXANDER v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv07088
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
POLYAK et al v. ALEXANDER et al
as 2:2015cv03768
Plaintiff:
VLADISAV POLYAK and ALLCARE DENTAL GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
ALLEN ALEXANDER, MICHAEL ALEXANDER, SOPHIA ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Michael Alexander v. New Jersey Department of Tran
as 14-4125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
ARMORPOXY, INC. v. ESSENTIAL PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv07730
Plaintiff:
ARMORPOXY, INC.
Defendant:
ESSENTIAL PRODUCTS OF AMERICA, INC. and MICHAEL ALEXANDER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
