Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Justin Credico v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-2435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, ROBERT MUELLER and others
Assem Abulkhair v. President USA, et al
as 12-3358
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT USA, in his official capacity, GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States, individually, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in his official capacity and others
MARTINEZ v. AVILES et al
as 2:2010cv05083
Petitioner:
DOMINGO MARTINEZ
Respondent:
O. AVILES, J. NAPOLATANO, JULIE L. MYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Assem Abulkhair v. George Bush, et al
as 10-2812
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ASSEM A. ABULKHAIR
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, President of the United States, MICHAEL B. MUKASEY, Attorney General of the United States, MICHAEL CHERTOFF and others
Smith v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2010cv00500
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Smith
Defendant:
United States Of America, Thomas F. Hogan, Patrick J. Attridge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
WATKINS v. MUKASEY
as 1:2009cv00050
Petitioner:
PELE LACRUZ WATKINS
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00208
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00075
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
THOM v. MUKASEY
as 1:2009cv00212
Petitioner:
RICKFORD AZANDE THOM
Respondent:
MICHAEL B. MUKASEY
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
