Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv08331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv19907
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
MORGAN v. DOZIER et al
as 7:2021cv00164
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO LAMAR MORGAN
Defendant:
GREGORY C DOZIER, CHRISTOPHER CARR, MICHAEL BARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55600
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
John Lucas v. County of Kern, et al
as 20-16439
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL BARKER, MARY CLAIRE WALSH, COUNTY OF KERN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN LUCAS
BARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv28192
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN MICHAEL BARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22351
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKER v. YORK COUNTY et al
as 2:2020cv00163
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, YORK COUNTY, KEVIN MCCORMICK and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BARKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. County of Kern et al
as 1:2020cv00552
Defendant:
Cesar Ollague, Nancy Georgeson, Michael Barker and others
Plaintiff:
John Lucas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alred et al v. Preferred Compounding Corp et al
as 1:2019cv01563
Plaintiff:
Ricky Kilgore, Carson Williams Davis, Treavor Biggers and others
Defendant:
Preferred Compounding Corp and Charles Michael Barker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
