Cases 1 - 10 of 18
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC v. Beattie et al
as 0:2024cv01369
Plaintiff:
North Metro Harness Initiative LLC doing business as Running Aces
Defendant:
Michael Beattie, Craig Beaulieu, Raymond Brenny and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
BEATTY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14691
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEATTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv62239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BEATTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07942
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHAEL BEATTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BEATTY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07952
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL BEATTY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BEATTY v. WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC
as 4:2022cv00059
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BEATTY
Defendant:
WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA, INC. and WASTE PRO OF FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Beatty v. Accident Fund General Insurance Company et al
as 3:2017cv01001
Defendant:
Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, PMA Companies and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Beatty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Beattie v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-20060
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL BEATTIE
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Beattie v. Davis
as 4:2016cv02071
Petitioner:
James Michael Beattie
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Beattie v. Commissioner Social Security
as 16-1686
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BEATTIE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
