Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Cook v. Brooks et al
as 8:2023cv02735
Plaintiff:
Garrett Cook and Garrett M. Cook
Defendant:
Michael Brooks, Mark Dainty, Dina Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Brown et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00906
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Brown, David Daniel Ackman, Richard Acosta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jackson v. Brooks
as 1:2023cv01317
Plaintiff:
Damond Keith Jackson
Defendant:
Michael Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17130
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00719
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67328
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv51938
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02953
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MICHAEL BROOKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95179
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROOKS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55664
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
