Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ROPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02199
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CALVIN ROPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Duhon v. Lafayette Parish Correctional Center
as 6:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Michael Calvin Duhon
Defendant:
Warden Lafayette Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duhon v. Lafayette Parish Correctional Center
as 6:2022cv00476
Plaintiff:
Michael Calvin Duhon
Defendant:
Warden and Warden Lafayette Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Michael Calvin
as 22-6085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL CALVIN, a/k/a Mike
CALVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85580
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CALVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STONE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv33823
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CALVIN WAYNE STONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Duhon v. Madison Parish Correctional Center
as 6:2020cv00321
Plaintiff:
Michaels Calvin Duhon
Defendant:
Madison Parish Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CENTIMARK CORPORATION v. OSBORNE et al
as 2:2018cv01078
Defendant:
BLUSKY RESTORATION CONTRACTORS, LLC, PHILLIP HAMMETT, MICHAEL CALVIN and others
Plaintiff:
CENTIMARK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Calvin v. Alvarez et al
as 1:2016cv05095
Plaintiff:
Michael Calvin
Defendant:
Anita Alvarez and Cook County States Attorny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin v. Schmitt et al
as 1:2015cv06584
Plaintiff:
Michael Calvin
Defendant:
Schmitt, Collins, Anthony J. Annucci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
