Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Yonnedil Torres, et al v. Louis Milusnic, et al
as 21-55305
Petitioner:
VINCENT REED, YONNEDIL CARROR TORRES, FELIX SAMUEL GARCIA and others
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, in his capacity as Director of the Bureau of Prisons and LOUIS MILUSNIC, in his capacity as Warden of Lompoc
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANNY FABRICANT, Proposed Intervenor
Jeremy Pinson v. Michael Carvajal
as 21-55175
Petitioner / Appellant:
JEREMY VAUGHN PINSON
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, BOP Director
Robert Rand v. Michael Carvajal et al
as 2:2021cv00720
Plaintiff:
Robert Rand
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Patricia Bradley and The Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv09379
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Collins v. United States of America Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2020mc00331
Defendant:
William Watson, Michael Carvajal and United States of America Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Ronald Xavier Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Xavier Collins v. United States of America et al
as 5:2020cv02582
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Dr William Watson, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Xavier Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeremy Pinson v. Michael Carvajal
as 5:2020cv02599
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chatmon v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 2:2020cv02291
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Brian Koehn, David Gonzalez and others
Petitioner:
Kolany Chatmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chatmon v. Carvajal
as 2:2020cv02220
Petitioner:
Kolany Vidal Chatmon, Sr.
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Chatmon v. Carvajal et al
as 2:2020cv02182
Defendant:
Melissa Ross, Gene Beasley, Michael Carvajal and others
Plaintiff:
Kolany Vidal Chatmon, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
