Cases 1 - 9 of 9
COOLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11113
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN MICHAEL COOLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dinehart v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv05444
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe 1-5, Michael Cooley and Best Buy Co., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Dinehart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COOLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53006
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL COOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COOLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv65301
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COOLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooley v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv01158
Plaintiff:
Gregory Michael Cooley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cooley et al v. Bard Access Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00668
Defendant:
Bard Access Systems, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Cooley and Michael Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burrows et al v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.
as 2:2009cv06943
Plaintiff:
Lisa Burrows, Robert Burrows, Tashonda Barnes and others
Defendant:
Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., Bechtel National Inc., CH2M Hill Construction, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cooley v. Florida Attorney General et al
as 3:2007cv00910
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Cooley
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hyannis Air Service v. Cooley
as 2:2007cv00393
Plaintiff:
Hyannis Air Service and Hyannis Air Service
Defendant:
Michael Cooley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
