Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Morfessis et al v. Alro Steel Corporation et al
as 1:2024cv00407
Plaintiff:
Nikolaos Telemachos Morfessis and Kathleen Jane Stine
Defendant:
Alro Steel Corporation and Michael Daniel Colon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Daniels
as 1:2022cv00926
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Michael Daniels doing business as Classic Painting and Home Improvement
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DANIELS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv07942
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC.
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANIELS
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DANIELS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, CHARLES H. RAMSEY, JEFFERY DEACON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv05959
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANIELS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael O'Connor v. Commissioner Social Security
as 11-2383
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DANIEL O'CONNOR
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY
OCONNOR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANIEL OCONNOR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
