Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Burns et al v. Meta Platforms Inc
as 2:2023cv01580
Plaintiff:
Steven Burns, Charmaine Starnes, Sandra K Garrison and others
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael RobinsonIn re: Michael Robinson
as 22-5387
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL E. ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Robinson v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv00153
Petitioner:
Michael E Robinson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Michael RobinsonIn re: Michael Robinson
as 20-5818
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL E. ROBINSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ruth Morris, et al v. The Estate of Storrs M. Bishop, et al
as 16-35973
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUTH R. MORRIS, ROY B. ROBINSON and KAREN ROBINSON, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael E. Robinson
Defendant - Appellee:
THE ESTATE OF STORRS M. BISHOP, III and PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Ruth Morris, et al v. Progressive NW Ins. Co., et al
as 16-35973
Defendant:
THE ESTATE OF STORRS M. BISHOP, III
Defendant / Appellee:
PROGRESSIVE NORTHWESTERN INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROY B. ROBINSON, RUTH R. MORRIS and KAREN ROBINSON, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Michael E. Robinson
ROBINSON v. CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2016cv06945
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. ROBINSON
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv20979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Robinson v. USA-TVV
as 3:2013cv00512
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael E Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Michael Robinson
as 11-5989
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. ROBINSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
