Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Michael Fitzgerald, et al v. Maude Murray
as 22-2224
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD and WORLD WISDOM, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
MAUDE MURRAY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
FITZGERALD et al v. MURRAY et al
as 1:2021cv01822
Defendant:
BEACON BOOKS AND MEDIA, LTD and MAUDE MURRAY
Plaintiff:
WORLD WISDOM, INC. and MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
May v. Romans Motor Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv06059
Defendant:
Romans Transportation, Inc., Romans Motor Freight, Inc. and Michael Fitzgerald
Plaintiff:
Clyde May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bates v. Winnebago County et al
as 3:2018cv50006
Plaintiff:
John Bates
Defendant:
Winnebago County, Thomas Warmoth, Wesley Ganz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Bauer v. Fitzgerald
as 2:2009cv02020
Plaintiff:
Hank A Bauer
Defendant:
Michael Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Divane et al v. M 5 Electrical Contractors, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
William T Divane, Jr, Kenneth J Bauwens, Michael J Caddigan and others
Defendant:
M 5 Electrical Contractors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Don Campbell v. Catherine Haberkorn, et al
as 08-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DON CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CATHERINE HABERKORN, Judge, MICHAEL FITZGERALD, Deputy Sheriff, PHYLLIS YAEGER and others
Campbell v. Haberkorn et al
as 1:2007cv06337
Plaintiff:
Don Campbell
Defendant:
Catherine Haberkorn, Michael Fitzgerald, Deputy Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiliam T. Divane et al V. Randy Miller
as 1:2007cv04771
Plaintiff:
William T Divane, Kenneth J Bauwens, Michael J Caddigan and others
Defendant:
Randy Miller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
