Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00832
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mens Petit v. Gurney's Inn Resort & Spa LLC et al
as 1:2022cv07987
Plaintiff:
Mens Petit
Defendant:
Gurney's Inn Resort & Spa LLC, MEI GNY Hospitality LLC, BLDG Management Co., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Lopez-Salas v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 6:2021cv00477
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lopez-Salas
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Bryan Collier, Lisa Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harward et al v. City Of Austin et al
as 1:2021cv00095
Plaintiff:
Michael Gillette, David May, Jo Ann Wiersema and others
Defendant:
Austin Community College and City Of Austin
Petitioner:
Mark Mathias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberson v. Jackson
as 20-40798
Defendant / Appellee:
Jonathan Gale, Amy Westbrook, Norris D. Jackson and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Lopez-Salas v. Aillon et al
as 6:2020cv00477
Defendant:
MIchael Goldman, Sangmin Kim, Saifur Rashid and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Lopez-Salas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOLDMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv25594
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL GOLDMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberson v. Jackson et al
as 6:2020cv00188
Defendant:
Amy Westbrook, Sherry A Dickens, Michael Goldman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cardora Roberson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1463
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Goldman v. Rio
as 1:2018cv02343
Plaintiff:
Michael Goldman
Defendant:
Richard R. Rio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
