Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Bowman v. Mosely et al
as 2:2024cv00637
Plaintiff:
Kevin Bowman
Defendant:
Detective Marlena Mosely, City of Philadelphia, Detective Dennis Dusack and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Gainey aka Naree Abdullah et al v. PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv04143
Plaintiff:
Grenile Gainey aka Naree Abdullah, Jarmaine Trice aka Eric Green, GRENILE GAINEY and others
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, YVONNE RUIZ, OFFICER JOSEPH WALSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams, Travis v. Kinyon, Sheryl et al
as 3:2021cv00514
Plaintiff:
Travis D. Williams
Defendant:
Sheryl Kinyon, Michael Gross, Jaime Adams and others
Not Classified By Court:
WSPF Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vives v. Bennett et al
as 1:2021cv06984
Plaintiff:
Luis Vives
Defendant:
Carl Bennett, Joseph Farrell and Michael Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERRY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv03699
Defendant:
MICHAEL GROSS, DENNIS DUSAK, WILLIAM EGENLAUF and others
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY BERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Vermilion County, Illinois
as 2:2019cv02208
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross
Defendant:
Vermilion County, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. FCI Herlong et al
as 2:2017cv02566
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross
Defendant:
FCI Herlong, Utilization Committee, McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gross v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00021
Petitioner:
Eugene Michael Gross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Michael Gro
as 08-35955
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL GROSS
Gross v. United States of America
as 2:2007cv00304
Plaintiff:
Michael Gross
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
